Blog 13: Peer Reviews

Overall, the peer reviews went very well. I like the paper-based review, which is much easier to read and make comment on.

I feel the most common problems appearing during the reviews is that we just talk about the two novels, but we didn’t the significance to readers. So it is like we wrote about “what”, but forgot about “why”. This can make the paper much deeper.

I need to work on the add more information and analysis to push my question a little further. Right now, mine is OK, but not good enough. “Why my thesis statement is significant to readers and why both writers want to tell this to readers” are the questions that I am going to work on.